Court Upholds Law That Could Imprison Pastors For Preaching Biblical Doctrines

by, lastresistance.com

In 2009, President Barack Obama signed the Hate Crimes Prevention Act into law. The law was pushed by every gay rights organization in the country. They claim that anyone who says anything negative about homosexuality is guilty of bullying them and therefore constitutes a hate crime.

Under the strictest definition of the law, any biblical preaching against sin in general, especially that of homosexuality could be considered hate language and therefore a hate crime. If convicted of the felony offense, a person could spend as much as 10 years in prison.

In 2010, the Hate Crimes Prevention Act’s constitutionality was challenged in court by the American Family Association of Michigan along with several Michigan pastors, Levon Yuille, Rene Ouellette and James Combs. The pastors and AFA of Michigan president Gary Glenn actively preached against homosexuality and that it was a sin according to the Bible. They saw the Hate Crimes Prevention Act as a violation of their constitutional rights for free speech and religion. Their federal lawsuit was filed against U.S. Attorney General Eric Holder.

Later that year Holder filed for a dismissal of the lawsuit on the grounds of standing and ripeness. Standing and ripeness are legal terms that have to do with their legal ability to file the suit for future circumstances that may or may not ever happen. A federal district judge granted Holder’s request and dismissed the lawsuit.

The dismissal ruling was appealed to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit by Robert Muise, Senior Counsel and Co-Founder of AFLC Co. Muise argued his case before the court in January of this year. The Sixth Circuit also dismissed the case claiming that the plaintiffs did not have proper legal standing to challenge the law.

After the disappointing news of the dismissal, Muise commented:

“There is no doubt that this federal criminal statute violates the First Amendment on its face. Thus, the Act chills the exercise of free speech, specifically the free speech of our clients, who speak out against homosexuality. This chilling effect is sufficient to confer standing to challenge the Act as a matter of law.”

David Yerushalmi, another Senior Counsel and Co-Founder of AFLC offered this statement:

“Criminalizing religious opposition to homosexuality while elevating those who engage in homosexual acts to a protected class under federal law is a clear violation of the Constitution and a frightening abuse of federal power.”

Not every member of Congress was in favor of the bill as it was passed when the Democrats ruled both the House and Senate. Iowa Congressman Steve King (R) wrote to AFLC on their efforts to challenge the legality of the Hate Crimes Prevention Act saying:

“I want to commend you for your courage to challenge the constitutionality of the Hate Crimes Prevention Act of 2009. As a Member of the House Committee on the Judiciary, I worked hard to stop this legislation in Committee and on the floor of the House of Representatives. . . . Like you, I believe this ‘Hate Crimes’ Act is unconstitutional and marks an unprecedented move to regulate and criminalize thoughts.”

This week, the AFLC took steps to have their case heard before the U.S. Supreme Court by filing a writ of certiorari. They are asking the high court to review the lower courts’ decisions to dismiss the case that challenges the constitutionality of the Hate Crimes law.

If the Supreme Court rejects the request to hear the case, then the Hate Crimes Prevention Act may and will be used against anyone that says or does anything that a homosexual deems offensive or hurts their pride and self-esteem. Pastors in churches across the country could find themselves facing 10 years in prison for preaching God’s Word.

The Hate Crimes Prevention Act protects perverted sinners from having their feelings hurt, but it does nothing to protect Christians from having someone like a homosexual denigrate their beliefs and feelings. They will still be allowed to say what they want about Jesus Christ or anyone that follows Him and that won’t be considered hate language. But tell someone that the Bible says homosexuality is a sin against God and you could go to jail.

This ladies and gentlemen is Obama’s agenda and if he gets re-elected next week, it will only get worse for us Christians. It will be the first time in our nation’s history that Christians will be openly and legally persecuted.

ALSO SEE:

Arizona man sent to jail for holding Bible studies in his home

Family Faces Fines for Hosting Bible Study

Pastor Sentenced To 2 Years In Prison For Teaching That Parents Should Spank Their Children

Advertisements

HELP SUPPORT THE EXALTED TRUTH with a Donation Today!

Enter your email address to follow the Exalted Truth and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Comments

  1. well, i’m glad i’m the first to respond. it is in the christian doctrine that homosexual and/ or lesbians will go to hell. i don’t really care who’s feelings i hurt on this subject, including you obama. God, the God of abraham, isaac and jacob promises that those guilty will feel the wrath of Go. also for the missed knowledge of those who believe they can be christian and saved by the blood of jesus christ are very much mistaken. i suggest getting on your knees and pray for mercy from God for this abomination

  2. Where are the replies to this post? I here crickets… Brothers and sisters the answer is right under your noses but the enemy has the flock so blind that we don’t see it. The church voluntarily enters under the jurisdiction of this government by REGISTERING for the 501c3. This is the problem they ignorantly walk into when the law clearly states that the church has exception NOT exemption. But they still willfully listen to lawyers (LUKE 11:46?) instead of TESTING ALL THINGS 1Thess 5:21… (including secular law) Lord have mercy!

    • Pastor Ron Taylor says:

      You are so right Gabriel. We pay unreal cost to have the 501c3 prepared and sent. For what, to have all our rights taken away? I for one would rather pay the taxes and forget any contact with the government/IRS.

  3. A. Lawyer says:

    The court didn’t exactly uphold the law. It’s a procedural issue. Someone is going to have to be charged under the law in order to have standing to challenge the law. There has to be an actual “case or controversy,” not a mere difference of opinion, before a challenge can be filed.

  4. Robert deRussy says:

    If man kind followed in the foot steps of homosexuality; man kind would cease to exist.WE PROMOTE LIFE. We do not promote suicide; genocide; extinction of man Kind.And we speak against the death of man kind in all cases.

  5. Cecil Orhenkowski says:

    Great blog here! Also your web site loads up fast! What host are you using? Can I get your affiliate link to your host? I wish my website loaded up as fast as yours lol

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: